Robbie
Sherwood
The Arizona Republic
Mar. 7, 2006
With
a revenue surplus now topping
$1.1 billion, 2006 is shaping up
to be the year of the tax cut at
the Arizona Legislature.
A pair of competing income and
property tax cuts of more than
$400 million took major steps
toward approval Monday and
appear headed for a collision
course in the Legislature's
impending budget debate.
Arizonans could get a slight
election-year boost to their
wallets to help encourage
consumer spending or ease the
pain of ballooning home values.
The problem: House and Senate
Republican leaders have publicly
promised only $250 million this
year for tax cuts. House Speaker
Jim Weiers and Senate President
Ken Bennett made that pledge
when the state's revenue surplus
was $850 million. But revenues
continue to pour in ahead of
expectations and there is
increasing political pressure to
give more money back to
taxpayers. Neither leader has
said whether he supports deeper
tax cuts in light of the growing
surplus.
"With all the surpluses, we
should have at least $350
million in tax relief," said
Steve Voeller, president of the
Arizona Free Enterprise Club, a
group of businessmen pushing for
income tax cuts. "The
Legislature has passed a state
employee pay raise already,
they've passed an
English-learner bill three
times. Before they spend any
more, they should pass tax
relief and show the taxpayers
that they also rank in the top
priorities."
Some form of tax cut would
appear to be a foregone
conclusion. But social-service
advocates say Arizona has
deep-rooted problems that will
go unattended in exchange for
giving taxpayers what one critic
described as "the price of a
steak dinner."
"The only people who seem to be
all exercised about tax cuts are
legislators," said Carol Kamin,
executive director of Children's
Action Alliance. "Voters want
decent education, they want
health care, they want clean
air, they want transportation.
They say it over and over again,
but the Legislature is not
listening."
Lawmakers, meanwhile, would
appear to be following Voeller's
script:
• The House gave preliminary
approval Monday to a scaled-back
$200 million personal and
corporate income tax cut of
about 5 percent next year. It
would be followed in 2007 by
another $200 million cut of 5
percent. Though House Bill 2489
would give back only about $60
to someone with a $50,000 salary
and about $190 to someone making
$100,000, backers such as the
Free Enterprise Club say it
would spur consumers to spend
and businesses to hire and
expand.
• Also Monday, the Senate
approved a bill that would
eliminate the county education
property tax, which is 43 cents
per $100 of assessed valuation.
Backershope this $200 million
measure will cushion the blow
for homeowners concerned about
soaring property valuations that
may will result in higher
property taxes. Senate Bill
1289, sponsored by Senate
Finance Chairman Dean Martin,
would save homeowners about $100
a year for a house worth
$250,000. The bill passed the
Senate 17-12. A companion bill
by House Ways and Means Chairman
Steve Huffman has passed the
House.
Martin predicted that Senate and
House leaders will ultimately
divide the tax-cut pie among the
property and income tax cut
supporters. Then they will
coalesce the plans into one
major bill that will be sent to
Gov. Janet Napolitano or
considered as part of the state
budget. Martin, R-Phoenix, said
it would likely all go into his
Senate Bill 1545, a tax package
that already includes the
property tax reduction and an
income tax reduction of 25
percent over five years.
That bill could get a Senate
floor vote later this week.
Napolitano has given no clues
whether she favors either
tax-cutting measure. She signed
a business-property tax cut last
year but has expressed no
support for income tax cuts, an
idea at odds with some of her
strongest supporters, such as
the Children's Action Alliance,
who feel education and social
services need help first.
Martin's idea for a phase-out of
the state income tax is
contained in another bill,
Senate Bill 1465, that also
gained approval Monday on a
16-13 vote. But that bill had
even some GOP lawmakers grousing
that the state's already-low
income tax needs no more cuts.
Sen. Carolyn Allen,
R-Scottsdale, said lawmakers
should focus on helping voters
cope with rising property
values: "If we put all our eggs
in the income tax basket, when
our constituents get their
property taxes in 2007, we're
going to have a riot on our
hands."
Kevin McCarthy of the Arizona
Tax Research Association hopes
lawmakers focus on property
taxes.
He warned that if lawmakers
don't provide tangible help,
that an initiative to impose a
California-style property tax
freeze will gain popularity with
voters.



