-

-

-
 
-

-
-

-

-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-



| |
-
-
|
- Property tax
plan riles Scottsdale
-
-
- Anne Ryman
The Arizona Republic
Feb. 17, 2003
-
-
- Opposition is growing to Gov. Janet
Napolitano's proposal that would increase property taxes in at least four school districts to help balance next year's state
budget.
-
- The governor is proposing to change
how the qualifying tax
rate is allocated, meaning school districts with a lot of property
wealth could end up with less state aid and would have to boost
property taxes
to make up for the loss.
-
- Hardest hit would be Scottsdale,
Dysart, Fountain Hills and Prescott unified school districts. The
plan, if approved by the Legislature, would shift $13 million from
state aid to property taxes.
-
- The bulk of the burden would fall on
the Scottsdale Unified School District, where an estimated $12.7
million in state funding could get transferred to property taxes.
-
- "I am concerned," Scottsdale
parent Molly Holzer said. "It seems like they're picking out
the more affluent suburbs to fund this tax hike."
-
- Scottsdale property owners could see
their taxes go up $58 a year for every $200,000 of assessed home
value, according to an analysis by the Arizona Tax Research
Association. Business owners could see their taxes jump $559 a year
for every $500,000 of assessment.
-
- "This is a targeted tax increase
on Scottsdale," said Michael Hunter, vice president of the
Arizona Tax Research Association.
-
- The Governor's Office says it is an
equity issue. Scottsdale has one of the lowest school tax rates
among school districts in Maricopa County, at $5.30 per $100
assessed value. Even with the increase, the rate would still be low
compared with many other school districts, said George Cunningham,
the governor's deputy chief of staff for finance and budget.
-
- "Any tax increase is a burden
they don't want to bear," he said. "But this is not going
to force anyone to mortgage their home."
-
- A similar proposal surfaced last year
but was discarded by the Legislature.
-
- A Republican budget proposal released
Jan. 28 does not include Napolitano's proposal to change the
qualifying tax rate. She will need the support of the Legislature
for it to pass.
-
- Some lawmakers say they intend to
fight the idea.
-
- Sen. Carolyn Allen, R-Scottsdale, said
she would not vote on a budget that includes changing the qualifying
tax rate.
-
- "I will be loud and I will be
vocal and I will throw a fit," she said.
-
- The possibility of higher taxes
worries Alice Suldol, who owns two small businesses in Fountain
Hills. She operates a home couture shop and an art design shop out
of the same building to save on rent. The increase would come at a
bad time, she said, because of the struggling economy.
-
- "Retail is a tough place to be
right now," she said. "Everybody is watching their
money."
-
- When the economy is soft, paying
higher taxes is not going to stimulate growth, said Rick Kidder,
director of public policy for the Scottsdale Area Chamber.
-
- "That would be a substantial
burden when small businesses are already suffering," he said.
-
- People who live in Fountain Hills
could see their rates increase more than Scottsdale under the
proposal.
-
- Here's the possible impact on other
communities:
• In a January 2002 legislative analysis of tax rates, people
living in the Fountain Hills School District would see an extra $74
in taxes for every $200,000 of assessed home
value. Fountain Hills businesses would get hit with $716 more
in taxes, according to the Arizona Tax Research Association.
• The same analysis predicted homeowners in the Dysart
Unified School District could pay an additional $73 a year while the
owner of a half-million-dollar business would shell out an extra
$702.
• School districts such as Paradise Valley, Mesa, Gilbert and
Deer Valley would be affected if the tax change occurs, but the
effect would be far less, according to the Arizona Tax Research
Association. For instance, a Mesa home assessed at $200,000 would
see less than a penny increase. A $500,000 business in Mesa would
pay about $11 extra a year.
|
|