• The most vexing ballot measure this election is Proposition 401, the nearly billion-dollar bond program for the Maricopa County Community College District.
On the one hand, it's not ambitious enough.
The
most
pressing
higher
education
need
in
the
Valley
right
now
is
for
choice
and
cost-effective,
student-friendly
environments.
The
community
colleges
provide
such
environments,
and
consideration
should
be
given
to
expanding
some
of
them
into
four-year,
degree-granting
institutions.
But
this
bond
program
doesn't
finance
such
a
transition.
On
the
other
hand,
the
Arizona
Tax
Research
Association
makes
a
good
case
that
the
bond
proposal
is
too
ambitious
for
the
district's
current
mission.
Enrollments
at
the
Valley's
community
colleges
will
undoubtedly
grow,
requiring
more
instructional
space.
But,
according
to
ATRA,
the
growth
projections
used
to
formulate
and
justify
Proposition
401
are
about
twice
what
the
district
is
currently
experiencing.
Moreover,
about
a
third
of
the
money
is
going
for
computers
and
equipment
for
which
debt-financing
isn't
cost-effective.
The
current
mission
of
the
community
colleges
is
valuable,
but
also
overstated
in
one
significant
regard.
Much
is
made
of
the
"partnership"
between
businesses
and
the
colleges.
But
to
a
large
extent,
this
"partnership"
consists
of
taxpayers
subsidizing
job
training
for
these
businesses.
Understandable
why
the
businesses
would
like
that.
But
not
so
clear
why
that
should
be
an
obligation
of
taxpayers.
• The
establishment
media
continue
to
suspend
their
critical
thinking
skills
when
it
comes
to
stories
damaging
to
President
Bush
and
his
administration.
On
Monday,
the
New
York
Times
reported
that
nearly
380
tons
of
high
explosives
had
been
looted
from
a
munitions
storage
facility
south
of
Baghdad
after
the
area
had
fallen
to
the
control
of
the
United
States.
John
Kerry
promptly
seized
upon
the
story
as
demonstrating
President
Bush's
incompetence
as
commander
in
chief.
The
charge
has
become
a
centerpiece
of
his
going-home
argument.
It
was
quickly
established,
however,
that
a
weapons
inspection
team
found
that
the
material
was
missing
within
a
month
and
a
half
of
the
fall
of
Baghdad.
There
was
very
little
traffic
on
the
roads
during
the
interim,
meaning
it
was
unlikely
that
scores
of
heavy
trucks
transporting
explosives
would
have
gone
unnoticed.
And
highly
unlikely
that
nearly
380
tons
of
material
got
out
via
backpacks
or
light
trucks.
It's
at
least
as
plausible
that
Saddam's
regime
moved
the
material
before
American
troops
seized
the
area,
an
obvious
possibility
not
even
mentioned
in
the
Times'
account.
This
doesn't
quite
rank
with
CBS
overlooking
obvious
problems
with
forged
documents
in
its
eagerness
to
nail
Bush
about
his
National
Guard
service.
But
it's
revealing,
nevertheless.
• Particularly
when
Kerry's
serial
commission
of
a
math
felony
goes
completely
unnoted
or
examined.
Kerry
wants
to
repeal
Bush's
tax
cuts
for
those
making
more
than
$200,000
a
year,
which
would
raise
in
the
range
of
$60
billion
to
$80
billion
a
year
in
federal
revenues.
That's
about
what
Kerry
says
his
health
care
plan
would
cost,
although
independent
sources
peg
the
price
much
higher.
In
any
event,
it
would
be
fair
argumentation
for
Kerry
to
say
that
Bush
favored
giving
tax
cuts
to
the
wealthy
instead
of
the
health
care
improvements
Kerry
proposes.
But
Kerry
makes
the
same
argument
about
virtually
everything,
and
is
escalating
it
as
the
campaign
comes
to
a
close.
In
the
campaign's
closing
weeks,
he
has
said
that,
without
the
Bush
tax
cuts
for
the
wealthy,
No
Child
Left
Behind
could
be
fully
funded,
Social
Security
could
be
saved,
and
more
could
be
done
with
homeland
security.
He
keeps
spending
the
same
money
several
times
over.
Kerry
is
trying
to
create
the
impression
that
without
tax
cuts
for
the
wealthy,
all
domestic
problems
can
be
solved
and
there
are
no
tough
fiscal
choices
facing
the
country.
And
that
ain't
so.
• The
state's
fiscal
problems
would
be
eased,
at
least
in
the
future,
by
Proposition
101,
arguably
the
most
important
ballot
measure
before
the
voters.
Proposition
101
would
require
ballot
measures
that
obligate
the
state
to
spend
money
to
include
a
dedicated
source
of
revenue
to
pay
for
it.
If
the
dedicated
source
fell
short,
the
Legislature
could
reduce
the
spending
accordingly.
A
state
budget
is
intrinsically
a
balancing
act.
Without
a
dedicated
revenue
source,
voters
are
asked
to
make
a
decision
about
mandated
spending
without
knowing
the
true
cost,
in
either
higher
taxes
or
reduced
spending
elsewhere.
For
example,
in
2000
voters
approved
expanding
eligibility
for
the
state's
Medicaid
program.
Proponents
said
that
federal
funds
and
tobacco
settlement
monies
would
cover
the
entire
cost.
But
that
proved
not
to
be
the
case,
and
the
expansion
is
now
costing
the
state
General
Fund
more
than
$200
million
a
year.
In
other
words,
voters
made
a
decision
about
a
false
choice.
Gov.
Janet
Napolitano
put
it
well
in
expressing
support
for
Proposition
101
at
her
weekly
press
conference
this
week:
Voters
deserve
to
know
where
the
money
is
going
to
come
from.



