Broader
Perspective Needed
on School Rankings
- By
Michael
Hunter
- Sierra
Vista
Herald
- May
4,
2004
It
is not uncommon to
hear the news media
and public school
advocates describe
Arizona’s public
school system as
"the worst in
the nation" or
"bottom of the
heap." School
funding statistics
are sometimes lumped
together or used
interchangeably, and
rather recklessly,
in order to make a
point for or against
some school funding
proposal.
One
article in The
Arizona Republic
noted that
"Arizona’s
rock-bottom ranking
in education polls
has been a deterrent
for some firms
considering a move
to the Valley . .
." (Sept. 13,
2003).
Another
memorable Republic
editorial in
support of the Prop
301 sales tax
increase stated that
"this measure
indisputably is
anchored in a single
fact: that until it
is passed, Arizona
teachers are paid
worse than any other
public school
teachers in
America"
(September 26,
2000). The same
editorial concluded:
"raising
[Arizona] from the
bottom of the salary
ladder is a vital
first step."
While
it is widely
accepted and quoted
that Arizona’s
per-pupil
expenditures for
maintenance and
operation (M&O)
rank low nationally,
it does not follow
that instructional
staff or teacher pay
is last in the
nation.
The
National Education
Association (NEA),
the largest teacher’s
union in the nation,
ranks Arizona 10th
for school year
2001-02 in average
salaries for
"instructional
staff"
($51,089).
The
NEA defines
instructional staff
as including
"consultants or
supervisors of
instruction,
principles,
teachers, guidance
personnel,
librarians,
psychological
personnel, and other
instructional
staff." The
instructional staff
category does not
include such
positions such as
"administrative
staff, attendance
personnel, health
service personnel,
or clerical
personnel."
Arizona’s
average
instructional staff
salaries grew 7.5%
between 2000-01 and
2001-02, ranking 3rd
nationally in terms
of percentage
growth. Between
1991-92 and 2001-02,
the NEA calculates
the percentage
change in
instructional staff
salaries, adjusted
for inflation, at
8.7%, ranking
Arizona 11th
nationally.
Calculating
these average
salaries as a
percentage of per
capita personal
income is a common
method that accounts
for differences in
the underlying
wealth between
states. Arizona’s
average
instructional staff
salary is nearly
double the per
capita personal
income figure,
placing this state
at the top of the
national ranking.
Arizona
faces many of the
same challenges that
confront other
rapidly growing
states. According to
the NEA, only Nevada
and Florida
surpassed Arizona in
the percentage
change in public
school enrollment
between Fall 2000
and Fall 2001. Only
Nevada had a larger
percentage change in
high school
graduates between
1991-92 and 2001-02.
Such
rapid growth is
reflected in many
national statistics.
According to the
American Federation
of Teachers, Arizona
is among states with
the least
experienced teaching
force in the U.S.
Arizona
teachers also have
full classrooms.
With an estimated 18
to 20 students to
every teacher,
Arizona ranks high
compared to other
states, putting us
in the company of
other fast-growing
states, such as
California, Utah,
Washington, Florida,
and Nevada.
Arizona
has also had to
commit enormous sums
of taxpayers dollars
to the construction
and renovation of
school buildings. In
fact, data from the
National Center for
Education Statistics
(NCES) shows that in
2000-01, Arizona
outpaced every other
state in per-pupil
expenditures for
capital.
Despite
these challenges,
Arizona’s
classroom teachers
fair better than one
might be led to
think. According to
the NEA, Arizona’s
average teacher
salary of $40,894
ranks 28th (between
South Carolina and
Vermont) for school
year 2001-2002.
Adjusting the
average teacher
salary figures for
differences between
states in per capita
personal income,
Arizona climbs to
14th in the national
ranking.
Contrasting
the last decade’s
growth in
instructional staff
pay, the percentage
change in inflation
adjusted average
teacher salaries
ranks Arizona 31st.
Nevertheless,
between 2000-01 and
2001-02, average pay
for teachers in
Arizona climbed
7.5%, ranking 4th
nationally.
While
Arizona certainly
has many demographic
challenges, Arizona’s
academic outcomes
are not as bad as
you might have been
led to believe. For
example, the Arizona
Legislative Exchange
Council ranks
Arizona 17th
in their overall
ranking of states by
academic
achievement.
The
almost constant
drumbeat from
several Arizona news
outlets and members
of the spending
lobby is that
Arizona schools rank
last in everything
that’s good and
first in everything
that’s bad. Not
only is this
incorrect, the
damage Arizona is
willing to inflict
on itself by
continuing to
propagate this
misleading
information will
have a long-lasting
impact on our
reputation among
other states.